Posts tagged as:

ABC

The Washington Post reports that Virginia Governor Bob McDonnell is making progress on his proposal to privatize the state’s liquor stores. That’s good news, but what’s really interesting are the comments on the story. Commenters overwhelmingly oppose the idea. A sampling:

One of the nice things about living in Virginia, is not seeing big “LIQUOR” OR “CUT RATE LIQUOR” signs on every corner.
-
Virginia’s ABC stores are clean, quiet, civilized, and a good neighbor on the block. I’ve never been in a commercial liquor store that wasn’t ugly and dirty.
-
People aren’t clamoring for privately owned liquor stores in Virginia. In fact, to many of us, the well run, neat, and safe Virginia ABC stores are highly preferable to the seedy private liquor stores that you see in other states.
-
I agree with most of the comments posted. If it’s not broke - don’t fix it. All in all, the Virginia state store system works. While prices may not be as low as those in D.C., they still are competitve. Let’s not sacrifice a system that works for a short term, one-time injection of cash.
-
Agree that it is nice to have clean liquor stores and not ghetto liquor stores on every corner like in other states.
-
I completely agree with those who point out that having the ABC stores selling liquor means I don’t have to see billboards and signboards on every corner advertising cut-rate liquor. It’s one of the nice things about Virginia.

It’s hard to imagine any good reason why the state would be better at selling liquor than profit-seeking business owners. It’s a safe bet that none of these commenters are particularly into spirits. While Virginia stores might be clean, they’re also completely soulless: The same convenience store atmosphere and poor selection at all of them. The employees usually have no knowledge of the products they carry, prices are high, and if your tastes go at all beyond the basic brands they probably don’t have what you’re looking for. Spirit lovers either buy in DC, buy online, or suffer without.

People who aren’t into spirits have no incentive to care about this. Ads for sale prices are of no interest to them, though people who drink are happy to receive the information. The same applies to the poor selections. Who cares if you can’t find creme de violette in Virginia? A handful of consumers and specialty entrepreneurs might, but the law prevents them from doing business together and is not easily changed.

Call it the Beer We Got principle, after Alabama representative Alan Holmes’ classic speech objecting to a bill to legalize high-alcohol beers in his state (starts about 5:30):

Yeah, what’s wrong with the beer we got? I mean the beer we got drink pretty good, don’t it?

To the uninterested consumer the “X we got” will always be good enough. That’s why the state should pretty much never be in the retail business.

[Via @ivangosorio.]

Previously:
Go, Bob, go!
Virginia’s Archaic Beverage Commission

Permalink - Share/Save - Comments (3)

It’s not often that I get to give the Virginia ABC credit for doing something right, so I’m happy to pass this along:

Peter Pflug says he should be able to charge more for mixed drinks at his restaurant and bar in Clarendon, but a long-standing food-to-liquor ratio has hindered his wishes.

The owner of Clarendon Grill was busted by the Virginia Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC) a few years ago for failing to maintain the required food-to-liquor ratio — the same time he noticed the nighttime crowd in Arlington County was acquiring a taste for pricier liquor. [...]

But that has caused the food-to-liquor ratio to get out of whack in more affluent places such as Arlington because “you can get away with selling $12 martinis as opposed to other parts of the state where you can’t,” Pflug said.

To better balance the 45-to-55 food-to-liquor ratio, Pflug and 11 other Virginia restaurant operators have joined ABC’s two-year pilot project to test an alternative way to calculate the ratio for mixed beverage licensees.

Rather than comparing the percentage of food sales to mixed-beverage sales, the pilot is based on alcohol volume. Participating licensees can sell $350 of food per one gallon of alcohol bought from ABC. Beer and wine aren’t included in either equation.

It’s nice to see that Arlington is trending toward more liquor sales and an appreciation for better spirits and cocktails. However having to tailor one’s menu to result in a ratio of $350 food/one gallon of alcohol is still an absurd way to run a restaurant; this kind of regulation is one reason among many that I can’t imagine ever opening a bar in Virginia. It would be much smarter to eliminate ratios entirely and simply require that food is available to patrons who want it.

[Thanks to Brandon Arnold for the link!]

Previously:
Brown and Bragg take on the ABC
Banning beer pong
Banning beer popsicles
Banning sangria

Permalink - Share/Save - Comments (4)