Jacob Grier: Coffee, Cocktails, Commentary & Conjuring

Jacob Grier

Coffee, Cocktails, Commentary, and Conjuring

July 1, 2008

Magic, mixology, and Mario

It’s a shame I don’t have $1,500 to blow on dinner in New York, because if I did I would not want to miss this:

A magician, mixologist and chef Mario Batali are combining for a new type of event. The Magic, Martinis and Mario event the first of which is taking place on September 18 at Del Posto, Batali’s restaurant in New York, offers more than just a dinner. Mixologist and Fine Living Network star, Tony Abou-Ganim will design custom cocktails for this special evening and teach diners how to recreate them at home. Also during the cocktail hour, entertainer Billy Harris will show sleight-of-hand magic tricks.

Each of the four courses of the Italian meal will be introduced by Batali and the dishes will be paired with wines from LaMozza, Mario’s own vineyard in Tuscany, as well as the Friuli Bastianich vineyard. After the meal Billy Harris will perform his stage show.

If they want to cut costs for the next event, they should find someone who can cover both the cocktails and the card tricks. I knew I’ve been on the wrong career path this year…

[Via Cold Mud.]

Posted by Jacob Grier at 1:17 pm in Magic


May 7, 2008

Beware of wizardry

This story of a Florida substitute teacher being fired for practicing “wizardry” is just bizarre:

The telephone call that spelled the end of Jim Piculas’ career as a substitute teacher in Pasco came on a January day about a week after he performed the disappearing-toothpick trick for a group of rapt middle school students.

Pat Sinclair, who oversees substitute teachers in the Pasco County School District, was on the phone. She told Piculas there had been a complaint about his performance at Rushe Middle School in Land O’ Lakes.

He asked what she meant.

“She said, ‘You’ve been accused of wizardry,’ ” Piculas said…

The school district puts a somewhat different spin on the disappearing-toothpick incident.

Performing a magic trick at Rushe Middle is just one of the reasons the school district gives for dumping Piculas from the substitute-teacher list. The others are: Piculas did not follow the lesson plans, he allowed students on computers even though another teacher said not to, and he told the fifth-period student peer that she was in charge.

Clearly just a cover for deep-seated anti-magician bias…

[Via Seeing the Forest.]

Posted by Jacob Grier at 2:30 pm in Magic


March 28, 2008

Magician or a bouncy

For the past few years I’ve had a love/hate relationship with magic. At its best, the art is a vehicle for self-expression, masterful skill, humor, beauty, and wonder. Yet at the level it’s usually practiced, performance barely rises above the level of adolescent talent show. (See Adam Gopnik’s excellent article in the March 17 New Yorker for a discussion of this.)

As a reminder of exactly where magic stands in the public perception, it’s useful to keep an eye on the Craigslist ads. This one, for example:

Magician or a bouncy for kids to jump in

I am having a birthday party for 2 of my kids on April 5th and I am looking for a Magician that will not charge alot but will do a great job and make my kids happy. or I am looking for someone that has a bouncer/bouncy, you know those big things that you blow up for the kids to jump in. I would like to borrow for a small charge just for a few hours/ half a day. Please let me know if anyone can help me, it would greatly appreciated.
Thank you so much

Got it? Magicians are 1) for kids, 2) not worth paying much for, and 3) roughly equivalent to a big, blow up bouncy.

Oh well, at least the bartender’s craft is treated with respect.

Posted by Jacob Grier at 12:29 pm in Magic


March 12, 2008

Criss Angel spoofs David Blaine

This is my favorite Blaine parody yet. I like Criss more after this, and the Johnny Thompson cameo is fun too.

Posted by Jacob Grier at 4:51 pm in Amusing| Magic


January 10, 2008

Magical Macbeth

I passed on the all-nude Macbeth that played in Arlington last year, but I won’t be missing Teller’s production. Teller, the usually silent half of Penn and Teller, is bringing gory illusion to the play:

Years of close reading, of seeing productions and screen versions that he’s sometimes tolerated but mostly loathed — “Hate is one of the best fuels for artistic endeavor” — have led Teller to an epiphany or two. An example: “Macbeth” is a supernatural horror thriller. “I’ve begun to think that one of its themes is a lack of understanding about where reality leaves off and your own internal perceptions begin,” he said. “The play is full of allusions to hallucinations. Macbeth has hallucinations. Mrs. Macbeth has hallucinations.

“I thought it might be a very interesting idea to do a production in which all the magic stuff fooled audiences so that they’d be in the exact same position as Macbeth. I know it’s a pretty cerebral idea, the idea that we’re trying to see what it’s like to be Macbeth. But,” he added with palpable delight, “where it leads you is some very weird places.”

“Macbeth,” as envisioned by Teller, is not, as in many versions, a downer with a glum title character. “I just think that pushes things in the wrong direction,” he said. The right direction? “It’s a thrill ride,” he said. “The play was written essentially to make James I happy, and he was a paranoid schizophrenic who believed in witchcraft. So ‘Macbeth’ is a wonderful paranoid schizophrenic fantasy and everyone is having a jolly good fiendish time. If there’s one thing we’ll try not to miss is how much fun this play is.”

After opening in New Jersey, the play will come to DC’s Folger theater starting in February.

Posted by Jacob Grier at 4:35 pm in Art and Culture| DC| Magic


November 1, 2007

Uri Geller on the Tonight Show

I haven’t caught any episodes of Phenomenon yet, but with Uri Geller back on network TV it’s fun looking back on this classic debunking orchestrated by James Randi and Johnny Carson.

The Tonight Show clip is about 5:45 in, but the whole video is worth watching for Randi’s Geller impersonation, Peter Popoff caught in the act, and a little “psychic surgery.”

Posted by Jacob Grier at 12:03 am in Magic


October 11, 2007

Food, wine, and magic

This Saturday the Georgetown BID hosts the Taste of Georgetown festival, a day for Georgetown restaurants to hit the streets and show off their menus. There will be some delicious food available, including baked goods from my old employer, Baked and Wired. In addition, there will be free wine tastings provided by Bacchus Wine Cellar, the French Wine Society, and Potomac Wine and Spirits.

There’s also going to be live entertainment — including me! I’ve been hired to perform strolling close-up magic throughout the event. It looks to be a beautiful fall day on Saturday, so come on out if you’re free from 11-4. Tickets are $5 per taste, 5 for $20.

This is also a good time to mention that I have a new regular bartending night: Monday evenings at Open City in Woodley Park. The slow pace of Mondays makes it a great night for experimenting with obscure, labor-intensive cocktails and the occasional card trick. Consider this an open invitation to stop in at the bar after work, 6:30-11:30.

Posted by Jacob Grier at 1:44 pm in Alcoholic Beverages| DC| Magic| Restaurants


September 23, 2007

Magic and IP roundup

The debate over magic and IP has continued this week in a few interesting directions. In the comments on Tim Lee’s TechDirt post, magician Andrew Mayne and I go back and forth over a few points, and he also responds in a podcast at iTricks. Head over to those sites if you’d like to follow the discussion.

The Economist covered the paper last week as well. On this I agree with Andrew that the magazine put an inexcusable lack of research into it. The debate amongst magicians was already going strong by its publication date, but no mention is given to criticism from within the magic community. That’s some very credulous writing from such a good magazine.

Finally, since in all of the recent discussion no one has published comments from Jacob Loshin, the paper’s author, I got in contact with him to see what he thought of the online reaction. While he’s unavailable to dive into the debate right now, it’s worth clarifying a couple things:

1) He is not an outsider to the magic community, and in fact performed semi-professionally for six years.

2) His point in the paper was not to argue that magic is an IP wonderland. Rather, he was more interested in the fact that the norms have evolved and function reasonably well — quite likely better than a regime of IP law would. This nuance has been lost in much of the paper’s coverage.

Posted by Jacob Grier at 12:24 pm in Magic


September 13, 2007

Pulling IP norms out of a hat

The methods or “secrets” of magicians are of paramount value in the trade. We conjurers work in a wonderfully creative community, awash in a steady stream of new sleights, props, tricks, books, and videos. Yet because our numbers are small, the protections of intellectual property law are often non-existent or too expensive to enforce. How do we get by without it?

That’s the question addressed in a fascinating paper called “Secrets Revealed: How Magicians Protect Intellectual Property Without Law.” It’s been making the rounds on a lot of weblogs as a case study of how innovation can thrive in the absence of IP law. The author, Jacob Loshin, outlines a very good model of the magic community; if he’s not a magician, he must have done a great deal of research to understand it so well. Here’s his basic thesis:

[Neither] copyright, patent, nor trade secret law offers significant protection for magicians’ intellectual property. Many of IP law’s qualifications and limitations flow from the assumption that intangible property is non-rival, and therefore that intellectual property holders should get something less robust than a full-fledged property right. Yet, IP law’s partial property rights ill-suit the unique characteristics of magic secrets, which require more protection than intellectual property law can spare to afford. Copyright law might prevent some stealing of magic routines, but it cannot prevent stealing or exposure of magic methods; patent law can prevent stealing of magic methods, but it cannot prevent exposure of them; finally, trade secret law might prevent some stealing and exposure of “proprietary magic,” but it cannot prevent the exposure of “common magic” without chilling the salutary practice of sharing among magicians…

The lack of protection from intellectual property law, however, has not stopped magicians from innovating and thriving. Intellectual property law leaves the most damaging threat to magic — exposure — undeterred. Yet, despite a few high profile incidents, the magic community’s intellectual property has not been subject to constant exposure. In this Part, we discover how magicians manage to create and enforce intellectual property rights without the help of formal intellectual property law. In short, the magic community has developed a fairly effective informal, norm-based IP regime which limits access, establishes use and exposure norms, and enforces violations — all outside the purview of the law.

The paper fleshes this out in much greater detail, so please read the whole thing for more information.

Loshin makes a strong case for the superiority of IP norms over IP law within the magic community, but not all magicians agree with his conclusions. An editor at iTricks.com writes:

“The paper lacks any actual economic research and most of all lacks input from magic creators. Creative people are constantly pulled from magic to places where intellectual property is better recognized,” said Andrew Mayne, who has worked with David Blaine, Penn and Teller and David Copperfield… “I’ve always felt that magic should be used as a negative example of what happens when the only power rests in the people with the most money and rule of law is nonexistent. By comparison, the music industry with its system of royalties and tracking for song writers looks like a wonderful utopia filled with chocolate rivers, bubble gum trees and cotton candy orchards.”

Economic research on magic product sales would indeed be interesting, but I think the paper holds up well without it. I’m curious who these people are that Mayne claims have been drawn away from magic because of a lack of IP protection. My impression is that the most creative magicians invent because they love the art, want to improve their acts, and seek acclaim from other magicians. Copying is a problem, but not, as far as I know, one that’s significantly driving out innovators.

An ongoing and bitter dispute between two high profile gaff makers provides a telling example of how creative magicians deal with theft. The props in question are difficult and expensive to create, but once developed they can be reverse engineered. The more established of the two craftsmen has alleged that the other has copied many of his original designs. But he’s not giving up. This is what he had to say about the conflict on a magicians’ forum:

Now some good things have come out of all this. I think that the feud/competition has actually increased my business by a rather large margin. And the competition has certainly been a catalyst for me to improve my products. That is good for the consumer, and also I have developed more pride in my work over the course. However, I really have to shake my head when I see these blatant copies of nearly everything I do. Not only that, [his] prices are substantially higher than mine, and I feel that I can safely say that I am putting a lot more time into making stuff than he is. Now I am getting advice to increase my prices to match his. Some think that higher prices mean better product, at least to those that aren’t in the know.

This strikes me as the typical response of a truly creative individual for whom making money off of his ideas is just one of many motivations.

None of this is to say that magic’s IP norms work perfectly. There are many cases of theft, some businesses have been hurt, and at times magicians keep innovations to themselves rather than risk seeing them knocked off by copycats. However, it’s far from clear that IP law would work better. Mayne envies the royalties and tracking of the music industry, but I can’t imagine applying that system to magic. In addition to being ineffective, it would risk a chilling effect on performances and inhibit the sharing that brings new magicians into the fold and fertilizes new ideas and methods.

If anything, it’s much more common to hear magicians complain about the tremendous glut of new products on the market rather than of a dearth of innovation. Despite the inevitable frustrations of being ripped off, the market is doing well.

One last observation: Though Loshin’s paper presents a thorough analysis of IP laws and norms among magicians, there is one new approach that, while relatively untried, is worth noting. A high profile magic creator and retailer recently introduced an innovative, very expensive (nearly $2000) prop system. The complexity of the craftsmanship renders it difficult to copy. However, to further protect the idea he is leasing, rather than selling, the system. Some details of the lease:

1. The system is leased without term and subject to a confidentiality agreement.

2. It can be sold and assigned only to another magician under certain conditions and subject to approval of the lessor. The price can be whatever the seller likes, but the new licensee must sign and notarize an assignment and release agreement. The original licensee will still be bound by the confidentiality agreement.

3. The license is similar to a software license. It grants rights to use the training materials and hardware but it is not to be shared.

I don’t know how effective this approach has been. Even if it is effective, my guess is it will only be affordable for very high-end products. In any case, it’s an interesting attempt at bringing legal IP protection into the magic community.

Update 9/17: Follow the debate at Techdirt.

Posted by Jacob Grier at 12:24 pm in Economics| Law| Magic


August 13, 2007

Happy ending for Barry’s

Barry’s Magic Shop, the one almost driven out of business last year under threat of eminent domain by Montgomery County, has re-opened in its brand new digs in White Flint. I haven’t been yet, but I look forward to visiting in celebration of Barry’s victory over the planners and the fact the DC area will still have a local magic shop.

Remember though, the relocation has been aided by taxpayers forced to subsidize it in the wake of the pr disaster this became for the county. In addition, the original land owner has not been compensated at all for the strong-armed sale of the property.

Previously:
MoCo double lifts from taxpayers
Property rights magically disappear in Wheaton

Posted by Jacob Grier at 5:46 pm in DC| Magic


April 24, 2007

Illusionators

Mind explosion! Great Criss Angel magic parody…

[h/t Barzelay.]

Posted by Jacob Grier at 9:25 am in Humor| Magic


April 12, 2007

MoCo double lifts from taxpayers

Remember Barry’s Magic Shop, the local business threatened with eviction by the government after Montgomery County used the threat of eminent domain to steal the building it leases? There’s good news today for the shop and the DC area magic community:

The shop’s owner, Barry Taylor, and Montgomery County Executive Isiah Leggett (D) announced a deal yesterday to relocate the shop from Georgia Avenue to 5544 Nicholson Lane in south Rockville, near White Flint Mall.

That’s a happy ending for Barry’s and I’m thrilled to hear it. But here’s the kicker:

The county will provide Taylor with $260,000 over five years to help relocate the shop.

“This is what government is about, really helping small businesses like this, businesses that could fall through the cracks,” Leggett said. “For me, small businesses are the heart of a community and the heart of what folks love about Montgomery County.”

I don’t begrudge Barry the subsidy given what he and his business have been through this year, but Montgomery taxpayers ought to be fuming. While Leggett takes credit for helping small businesses, they should recall that with the relocation aid and the cost of seizing the land in the first place, the county has spent over $1.25 million on this deal. The bulk of that subsidy goes to the developers in Wheaton who got Barry’s land cleared on the cheap. And as for small businesses, there are still dozens more in that center in Wheaton, most without the PR charm of a magic shop. If the county wants them gone to make way for developers, I won’t be surprised to see eminent domain invoked again.

And before gushing over the happy ending to the story, let’s not forget George Chaconas, the owner of the land who was strong-armed by the county into selling his land under threat of eminent domain. He’s no better off now than he was when this all started.

All of that said… congrats to Barry’s! It’s nice to see that the public outcry over the county’s abuse of eminent domain has saved the business.

See also: David Boaz’s take at Cato at Liberty and my previous coverage of the story.

Posted by Jacob Grier at 3:05 pm in Magic


October 15, 2006

Barry’s decision put on hold

No news is no news in the Barry’s Magic Shop case. Barry’s, you’ll remember, is the last remaining magic shop in the DC area and the building it leases was recently coerced from its owner under threat of eminent domain by Montgomery County. If redevelopment officials get their way this unique business will be torn down to make way for a highly dubious sidewalk plan.

On the 9th the County Council held a hearing to discuss the fate of the shop. I wish I’d known about it in time to be there in person. Fortunately, at-large Democrat Steven Silverman continued to defend the shop:

Council members said they were concerned that the plan for the sidewalk has been in the works since 1995, while the county just bought the Barry’s Magic Shop building from Mr. Taylor and his wife in May.

“You could have a situation where they would be displaced and you could end up with a project that doesn’t get approved or built for years, and that’s what I’m having trouble getting my arms around,” said council member Steven A. Silverman, at-large Democrat.

“Why would you demolish a building until you knew exactly what the cost would be or what you want to put in there?”

Full story here. A final decision date has not yet been set.

I’m glad to see Barry’s continue to receive sympathetic press, but the focus is disappointing. The emphasis is on small business losing ground to corporations, which is a tangential point at best here. Contrary to the Home Depot analogy quoted in the article, there’s no Mega Corporate Magic Warehouse moving into the neighborhood and driving little old Barry’s out of business. It’s the government taking Barry’s shop through the abusive threat of eminent domain. That part of the story has been obscured in almost all of the media coverage.

For more background on the case, see my previous post.

Posted by Jacob Grier at 10:18 pm in In the News| Magic


June 23, 2006

Property rights magically disappear in Wheaton

In the past decade much of magic retail sales has shifted online, leaving it relatively harder for bricks and mortar magic stores to stay afloat. Unless a store is in a tourist area, has a large Web presence, or is attached to a larger costume or theatrical outlet, running a profitable store that caters primarily to magicians is a tough business.

This is an unfortunate decline, as magic shops have played an important role in the development of the art. They are the spots where magicians go to hang out, where young dabblers get to know seasoned professionals and learn from them. For me, the shop that provided this experience was Danny’s Trix and Kix in Spring, TX. After a few months of merely purchasing tricks there, I eventually met up with some of the local pros who frequented the place. Their guidance was instrumental in my progression as a performer. Thousands of magicians around the country could tell similar stories.

Barry’s Magic Shop in Wheaton, MD, is the last of its kind remaining in the DC area. It’s been in business for thirty-one years, surviving the rise of e-commerce and competition from a large competitor in Baltimore. That takes a magic of its own kind. But whatever magic Barry’s possesses, it’s no match for county officials wielding the power of eminent domain. Montgomery County forcibly acquired title the building where Barry’s is housed a few months ago and is planning to evict Barry Taylor and tear the place down.

I had not been to Barry’s before because magic has been a smaller part of my life since moving to DC. But after reading on a local magicians’ list serve that Barry’s was being evicted and finding the county’s reasons for the taking highly dubious, I decided pay a visit with my camera this weekend and check the place out. Sadly, this case appears to be another of the type we’ve seen so much of in recent years: abuse of eminent domain to drive out an existing small business to make way for developers.

Barry’s is located on Georgia Ave. in one of the many strip malls that line the street north of the Beltway. The area is eclectic if not always charming. Barry’s neighbor on one side is an adult video store; bars and check cashing places abound. In this environment, Barry’s is a unique, family-friendly treasure the county ought to care about.

Upon entering the store, once can’t help but be struck by the history that emanates from the place. Magic memorabilia hanging from the walls and displayed in glass cases, stacks and stacks of books and videos for sale, and of course the standard demonstration counter where the staff shows off old standards and the latest tricks to customers looking for something new. It’s a well-stocked shop, and right away I regret not coming there sooner.

barrys-030.jpg

Everyone in the store is friendly, but the first greeting comes from Frankie, the store border collie. Frankie’s a bit of a star. When the postman arrives, he (or she, I didn’t check) runs up excitedly as the man drops off a biscuit with the mail. He does tricks, too, showing off his impressive goal keeping skills with a couple of stuffed balls. Frankie doesn’t perform for the camera, though. Here’s a shot of him declining to play, but you could more poetically interpret this as the sadness he expresses at his place of work being taken away. Frankie could be the poster dog for the consequences of eminent domain abuse.

barrys-023.jpg

I spend the next hour or so hanging out in the store, learning about the case as one of the owners, Susie Kang, asks customers to sign a petition expressing support for the store while cheering everyone up with gallows humor. In the meantime, normal store operations continue. At the counter, an adolescent kid buys a trick from the salesman. Dad is respectfully asked to retreat to the corner while the dealer explains the workings to the son, who will want to fool Dad with it later. Nostalgia sweeps in… I remember trips to the magic store like that!

If county officials have their way, none of this will last and an alley will take the place of these human interactions. By now, I hope, I have painted a sympathetic picture of Barry’s Magic Shop and given a good idea of the feel of what will be lost. It is necessary to turn next to the county’s reasons for destroying it. I am going to elaborate on this in some detail, as no one in the press has covered it well. Yet in doing so there is some risk in losing sight of the true issue at hand, of conceding the propriety of the county’s actions just in having the argument. The real story is that simply because a few county planners have decided that the land could be better used to attract developers than as a magic store, the man who owns the building has had his property forcibly taken from him and a small business that has thrived for decades is being evicted years before its lease is up. The rest is just details.

With that in mind, let’s go into those details. Barry’s is located at 11234 Georgia Ave. in one of the many strip malls that line the street. This is a view from the median:

barrys-016.jpg

Behind the store is a large shopping area with significantly more parking. This is a view of Barry’s from the rear parking lot:

barrys-004.jpg

Barry’s is the store in the center offset from the others. It has exclusive access to the handful of parking spaces in front of it. Notice the small alley located between Barry’s and the store on the right. Expanding this alley is the stated reason for the county’s takeover and eviction:

barrys-006.jpg

Though there are multiple exits from the shopping center, pedestrians occasionally use this alley as a convenient shortcut onto Georgia Avenue. The county claims that this alley is inadequate to the purpose. When I visited the store, I was told that not many pedestrians use the alley. Though there’s obviously an incentive for the owners to understate its use, this is consistent with my own observations — with the exception of Barry’s customers, I didn’t notice a single person walk through it while I was outside taking pictures.

To the county’s credit, the alley does leave something to be desired as a walkway. The small stairway on the left (see above) partially blocks access and this rail and ledge require some slight maneuvering to get through:

barrys-010.jpg

It does not appear that turning this alley into a more functional walkway without tearing down Barry’s would be difficult. Barry’s would surely consent to removing the small rear stairway as an alternative to closing down entirely. And the exit could be made more navigable by removing the last section of the rail and installing stairs or a ramp. This might require removing a parking space, but this is surely preferable to knocking down a long-standing business.

Regrettably, Montgomery County is not interested in finding ways to improve the alley that would leave the building in place. Instead, officials threatened the building’s owner, George Chaconas, that they would sieze the property using eminent domain and eventually took him to court. Chaconas concluded that he had no choice but to give in and agreed to a sale. The Examiner reports Chaconas’ feeling that this was not at all a consensual transfer:

The county threatened to condemn the building and, its owner George Chaconas said, finally sued last year. Chaconas said he settled out of court with the county agreeing to pay $987,000 for the building. He told The Examiner that he felt strong-armed into the deal.

“I didn’t sell it to the county,” Chaconas said. “They took it.”

County officials did not return phone calls from The Examiner requesting a response. I also tried calling for information and, unsurprisingly, was not given a reply either.

With the building now in the county’s hands, there is nothing stopping officials from evicting Barry and tearing the place down. Barry sums up the senselessness of this situation well, noting that “It’s going to cost over $2 million, and it’s still going to be an alleyway.” The tab for that $2 million expenditure will be picked up by taxpayers.

If this whole exchange sounds a bit fishy, it’s because this fight is about a lot more than an alleyway. County officials and big developers have been planning for years to dramatically change the face of the area with what is known as the Wheaton Redevelopment Project. Originally, planners were considering putting a Mall of America scale shopping center in the area. Fortunately that monstrosity got nixed. Developers and residents are currently fighting over proposals to raise height limitations on buildings to bring in larger stores, office buildings, and residences. This would be good for developers, obviously, and may be a good idea, but many residents fear losing Wheaton’s mix of independent businesses and becoming more like the smoothly corporate Silver Spring, which is just a few miles away and whose own redevelopment is much further along.

A fluff piece recently published in the Maryland Gazette describes the Redevelopment Project in rosy terms, complete with a big smiling photo of project director Joseph Davis. It’s a PR-friendly article that makes the project look like a model collaboration among county officials, developers, and existing business owners:

But it’s taken a lot of more than dollars and cents and bricks and mortar to make all this redevelopment happen. It’s taken a lot of listening.

Bozzuto officials have listened to suggestions from residents, small-business owners and others when creating plans, keeping in mind Wheaton’s need for more residential and office space, said Artie Harris, a vice president of the development company. ‘‘You don’t want to be a cookie-cutter community,” he said.

Local business officials and residents must be involved in the process or the projects might not meet their needs, said Marian Fryer, a Wheaton small-business owner who serves on several advisory committees. Besides more office and residential space, Wheaton needs to ensure that existing small businesses are not forced to move — as some did from downtown Silver Spring — and there is proper access to key sites such as the Westfield mall, she said.

That’s a lovely thought, but it’s completely out of touch with reality. That article was published June 9, well after the county was in court to seize George Chaconas’ land.

Joseph Davis finally spoke to the press about the issue in a Washington Times article published yesterday. There he explained that the alley was indeed being expanded for the sake of redevelopment:

On May 4, Montgomery County acquired the property that is home to Barry’s Magic Shop on Georgia Avenue. The building will be demolished to create pedestrian and handicapped access between the shops and parking lots on Georgia Avenue and the shops and lots on Triangle Lane, west of Georgia Avenue, said Joseph R. Davis, director of the Wheaton Redevelopment Program, which aims to create new retail, residential and office development in downtown Wheaton…

Mr. Davis said the shop’s location is the best place for a well-designed, well-lit walkway because it is mid-block between the two plazas.

Also the store, unlike the two shopping plazas it is sandwiched between, is a free-standing building.

“There are over 40 businesses on this block that would directly benefit from the demolition of this building,” Mr. Davis said, citing the improved access to downtown businesses the walkway is meant to create.

Let’s take a closer look at this claim. Here’s a satellite map of the shopping center with Barry’s marked with the red spot. That’s Georgia Avenue running vertically on the right:

barrys-sat.jpg

As Davis notes, the building is roughly in the middle of the block. He says that this is a compelling reason to knock it down. But while it might be nice to have a walkway there, it’s far from essential. For one thing, there is no intersection across the street from which pedestrians will be coming. I had to scramble across traffic to the median in order to take a picture of the front facade; most pedestrians would be coming from the intersections north and south of the shopping center, both of which already have entrances. Putting a big entrance where Barry’s sits just isn’t necessary.

Secondly, tearing down Barry’s to put in an alley is going to do nothing for redevelopment. The entrance will still just be an alley wedged between buildings in an old strip mall. Turning the area into the kind of place that the people with the Wheaton Redevelopment Project envision is going to require doing a lot of rebuilding. And with rebuilding comes flexibility. A similar entrance could be obtained by getting land from a willing buyer somewhere else on the strip with minimal impact on plans for the shopping center.

All of this makes the statement from the neighboring adult video store manager, quoted in the Times piece, not just appallingly indifferent but also extremely short-sighted:

A manager of the Cadmus II Video & Newsstand next door, said the store sells adult material and that he is not concerned with Mr. Taylor’s situation.

“I could care less about what’s happening to him; he ain’t got nothing to do with us,” said Earl, who declined to give his last name.

I’ve got news for Earl: when the area redevelopment begins in earnest, the friendly neighborhood planners aren’t going to be happy with a porn store flanking the shopping center entrance. If they’re willing to use eminent domain to replace a magic shop with an alley, I doubt they’ll think twice about knocking down an adult video store to put in some kind of upscale retail. I predict the eminent domain takings in Wheaton have just begun.

And this, really, is the major flaw in the Times article. Reading it one may easily be persuaded that putting in a walkway is the best use of the land, momentarily feel sad that the magic store is closing, and chalk it up to the costs of progress. It never mentions that the land was seized against the owner’s will through eminent domain. Sadness is inappropriate. This is a story that should make people angry. Angry that George Chaconas had his land taken from him. Angry that Barry Taylor and Suzie Kang are being evicted years before their lease is up. Angry that this is all being done with taxpayers’ money to subsidize the developers who will eventually move into the area, just because some guy named Joseph Davis thinks that’s the way things ought to be.

If creating a big walkway running perpendicular to a street with no corresponding intersection is truly the best use of the land where Barry’s sits, there is a simple way to make that happen: let the developers who will benefit buy up the land fairly and build it themselves. If there’s development potential here and property values go up, Barry’s might indeed have to move. That’s life. That’s the magic business. But at least that would be voluntary and the owners would have time to find a suitable new location.

With title to the land already transferred to Montgomery County, there may not be much left one can do for Barry’s. But the least one can do is write county officials and give this eminent domain abuse as much publicity as possible. If you have a weblog, especially if you’re in the DC area, please help spread the word.

Barry and Susie have also published a letter on their web site asking for support and listing contact information of the relevant government officials. I encourage you to read it. If you’re willing to voice your opinion on this matter, copy the email addresses there or click on this hyperlink to get them all at once. Let them know what you think, preferably without profanity, tempting as its use may be. Send a copy to Barry’s, too, so they can keep track of the responses.

Finally, if you have any additional information about this case or other eminent domain takings in connection with the Wheaton Redevelopment Project, please let me know by emailing me at jacobgrier - at - gmail.com. I suspect there is much more to this story that has yet to be reported.

[Update: Thanks to everyone who has helped publicize this situation so far:

The Pacific Legal Foundation
David Barzelay
DC Blogs
To The People
Mike Mott
Jeff Woodhead
Radley Balko
DC Transplant
Chad Wilcox

Your posts are appreciated. Thanks to those writing the government officials, too.]

Posted by Jacob Grier at 11:59 pm in In the News| Magic


September 26, 2005

“A social contract for disaster”

No, that’s not the latest dorky theme party put on by the Koch Fellows. It’s how British psychologist Richard Wiseman describes the relationship between magicians and their audiences.

You see, when I claimed a while ago that my powers were on loan from God, that was a bit of a fib. There are actually rational, logical explanations for how magic works and Professor Wiseman has been exploring this territory from a psychologist’s point of view. From the BBC:

As a former conjurer, he is uniquely qualified to understand the social dynamics between a magician and his audience and he argues that there is a lot more happening in a magic show than people realise.

“The really good performers,” he said, “the ones who know what they’re doing, have an incredible grasp of psychology”, and use it to convince you to see their version of events.

Most people are familiar with the term “misdirection,” the technique of getting an audience to look in one place while a secret action happens someplace else. The best magicians accomplish this in more subtle ways than simply pointing to the back of the room and saying, “Hey, look over there!”, such as by having things burst into flames unexpectedly on the side of the stage or employing scantily clad assistants. Or, if they’re really sneaky, they pull an O’Brien and slowly alter a person’s memory of events:

“For example,” said Professor Wiseman, “a magician might cut some cards and say ‘Right, they’re mixed up now’. Then he’ll do something else and then say ‘Now, remember I shuffled the cards at the start’.

“That word - ’shuffled’ - has gone in, and people think ‘Yeah, that’s right, the cards were shuffled’. But they weren’t, he just cut them. It’s cut to mix to shuffle. Small steps. If you had gone from cut to shuffle, it’s too much and people notice.”

Inattentional blindness plays a role, too:

[Dr. Nillie] Lavie specialises in inattention blindness. “The skill of a good magician is to make a very interesting, dramatic act with complex actions and interesting verbal utterances,” she said.

“He loads your attention with all this information, but it’s irrelevant to the act that he presents. It is so you don’t notice the deception.”

However, humans being natural sceptics go to magic shows knowing they are going to be deceived so they pay special attention to everything. But being overly focused can also be turned to the illusionist’s advantage.

She’s right except for the part about the information being irrelevant. Presentation is often structured to distract, but it also plays a role in constituting an effect. Three playing cards switching places for no reason is meaningless; setting their transpositions in the context of a story about how the performer once lost a lot of money in a game of three card monte provides an emotional hook and a motivation for what’s happening. Audiences aren’t stupid. They can tell the difference between a magician who’s just babbling to misdirect them one who offers a cohesive performance to draw them in.

So what motivates people to let magicians mess with their minds. After all, there is a fundamental problem with this relationship. At the end of the day, you are paying someone, to deceive you; you are twice the sucker.

Professor Wiseman calls it a “social contract for disaster”.

“I show you a trick, you want to know how it’s done, I am not going to tell you. Conflict.”

… Magicians have to manage that. And to do that they use these psychological techniques, but they are also giving something back.

In a renowned essay, Paul Harris, one of David Blaine’s technical advisers, has argued it is “astonishment”. This, he claims, is our natural state of mind; analogous to a childlike awe, that is lost in adulthood. Good magic, Harris claims, returns people to that state.

I was surprised to see the Paul Harris essay mentioned in the article. It is an influential piece among magicians, but it’s a lot more New Age mumbo-jumbo than it is empirical science. That said, there’s a lot of truth to it. Paul is a fantastically creative magician who’s done more than just about anyone to challenge his fellow practicioners to become more than tricky guys in cheap tuxes. On that note:

Today, it is the edgier performers like Derren Brown and David Blaine that people want to see.

They are both charged with wresting magic back from the grip of the likes of David Copperfield, Paul Daniels and Lance Burton - the poster boys for high-camp family entertainment.

Yes, Blaine and Brown will astonish, but they will also unsettle; they take you on a journey to the parts of your childhood inhabited by the scary clown, not Peter Pan and the fairies.

I don’t know if I’d call David Copperfield’s recent penchant for innuendo and sapphic dancing “high-camp family entertainment,” but the article is correct in noting the trend toward edgier magic that gets visceral reactions from the audience.

Transporting modern cynical audiences back to a childlike state of wonder is a tall order even for these kings of cool. But Wiseman believes Derren Brown is doubly astute, using people’s natural scepticism and demand for answers to his advantage.

“If he passed himself off as having psychic abilities, he wouldn’t be half as successful,” Professor Wiseman insists.

Instead, Brown offers a rational explanation dressed up in science to explain the tricks he does. He presents himself as having amazing powers of memory and psychological manipulation and so offers the audience a “believable” solution, albeit often the wrong one.

“Derren’s trick is not the magic, it’s creating the illusion that he has these fantastic abilities and getting you to believe him.”

Derren Brown is a controversial figure among magician, mainly for the way he excoriates the vast majority of his peers for being utterly lame and unoriginal. He hasn’t had much exposure in the U.S. yet, but I was lucky to stumble upon a live show of his the one night I spent in London this summer. He’s a fantastic performer; some of the stunts from the second act of his show had even me feeling physically uncomfortable at times.

However, the downside to his style is that he really does trick the audience into believing that his abilities to manipulate them psychologically are far beyond their true limits. Normally I think it’s laudable when a psychic performer tells his audience that there are rational explanations for everything he does, but Derren leads his fans uncomfortably into the range of pseudoscience. It was fun, yet mildly disturbing, talking with the intelligent audience members around me and hearing that they really believed Derren could control their thoughts hours in advance by showing them certain pictures or saying certain phrases. Is encouraging belief in sketchy subjects like neurolinguistic programming any better than claiming to have ESP?

Perhaps not, or perhaps it’s best to just enjoy the joke he’s playing on a culture so proud of its rational skepticism that it will buy into such bald-faced lies. But it’s late and this entry is long enough as is. I’ll save that topic for a potential future post.

[Via MagiCentric.]

Posted by Jacob Grier at 12:20 am in Magic


August 3, 2005

Bravo to Penn Jillette

Famous magician Penn Jillette displays a lot more sense discussing free speech than he does naming his daughter (not that I’m one to say anything about that). After AMC theaters declined to show The Aristocrats, a new movie he co-produced that features 100 comedians telling their versions of the same filthy joke, the film’s distributor said the decision is a blow to free speech. Penn, true to his libertarian roots, takes it all in stride:

“At least it’s showing that words have power, and we haven’t had that statement made in a while–and the fact that it’s being made by a goofy, stupid person doesn’t make it any less uplifting,” said the speaking half of comedy team Penn & Teller.

Jillette was referring to AMC Film Group Chairman Dick Walsh, who, with other executives, decided to reject the film…

Jillette added that although AMC’s decision could cost him money and viewers, he doesn’t want to play the victim.

“One thing I really hate is people like Michael Moore and Mel Gibson, who are the exact same person with 1,000 sit-ups’ difference,” Jillette said. “They try to make themselves into a martyr no matter how much money they’re making. We are not martyrs on this.

“For us to make any sort of statement that our artistic expression is being trounced would be self-serving, unpleasant and not true.”

The movie will be playing in other chains and independent houses. More info, a trailer, and show times are available at the The Aristocrats website. For the D.C. crowd, it’s showing at the Loews in Georgetown and the Landmark on E St. on August 12; for Virginians, it’s in Fairfax’s Cinema Arts Center on the 19th; and for the Marylandians, at the Landmark on Bethesda Row, also on the 19th.

[Link via MagiCentric.]

Posted by Jacob at 10:37 pm in Entertainment| Magic


June 30, 2005

Powers on loan from God

Many of you have asked me how I accomplish my feats of magic, and I have always declined to answer or pointed to my magician’s oath of secrecy. Now, alas, the truth is out. I, and every other magician on Earth, have been granted my powers by the deity Christopher Roller of Burnsville, MN. I humbly apologize for not acknowledging his contribution earlier.

[Via The Morning News.]

Posted by Jacob at 10:42 am in Magic


Next Page »