<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: First Watchmen photos</title>
	<link>http://www.jacobgrier.com/blog/archives/972.html</link>
	<description>Coffee, Cocktails &#38; More</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 13:16:45 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Matt Novak</title>
		<link>http://www.jacobgrier.com/blog/archives/972.html#comment-306565</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Novak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 17:38:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.jacobgrier.com/blog/archives/972.html#comment-306565</guid>
		<description>Moore seems to have an almost vitrolic level of contempt for the film adaptations of his works.  I understand that they aren't perfect recreations of his visions (and in some cases have probably been pretty crummy), but his level of disdain seems a little too strong.  This has been seen with other authors too.  I think everyone understands that books/graphic novels provide a much better insight than the movie adaptations of the same.  But that doesn't mean the movie adaptations are bad in and of themselves.  The movie V for Vendetta wasn't as complex or extreme as Moore's version, but it was still an excellent and enjoyable film.  Sometimes artists are a little too possessive of their visions, and a little too dismissive of other mediums.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Moore seems to have an almost vitrolic level of contempt for the film adaptations of his works.  I understand that they aren&#8217;t perfect recreations of his visions (and in some cases have probably been pretty crummy), but his level of disdain seems a little too strong.  This has been seen with other authors too.  I think everyone understands that books/graphic novels provide a much better insight than the movie adaptations of the same.  But that doesn&#8217;t mean the movie adaptations are bad in and of themselves.  The movie V for Vendetta wasn&#8217;t as complex or extreme as Moore&#8217;s version, but it was still an excellent and enjoyable film.  Sometimes artists are a little too possessive of their visions, and a little too dismissive of other mediums.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
