3 thoughts on “Links for 4/4/10”

  1. Ben: wow, the British House of Commons says there is “nothing to see here”? I’m sold!

  2. @Ben: Did you read the article before commenting? Its two main points are that the reputation of the IPCC has been seriously tarnished and that significant questions remain about the extent of harm global warming could cause (not denial of its existence). ClimateGate was just the most visible part of that, the larger problem being lack of transparency in the data (a point the House of Commons agrees with).

Comments are closed.