<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dead horses must hate election years</title>
	<link>http://www.jacobgrier.com/blog/archives/180.html</link>
	<description>Coffee, Cocktails &#38; More</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 23:53:35 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rachel</title>
		<link>http://www.jacobgrier.com/blog/archives/180.html#comment-589</link>
		<dc:creator>Rachel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.jacobgrier.com/blog/archives/180.html#comment-589</guid>
		<description>Eh, this one's an annual favorite.  Comes up every year, gets a bunch of op-ed ink, and goes away quietly.  Same goes for DC statehood.  I keep hoping for the rest of the city (and congress) to catch the same amendment ennui, but I think that's a vain wish.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eh, this one&#8217;s an annual favorite.  Comes up every year, gets a bunch of op-ed ink, and goes away quietly.  Same goes for DC statehood.  I keep hoping for the rest of the city (and congress) to catch the same amendment ennui, but I think that&#8217;s a vain wish.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarah</title>
		<link>http://www.jacobgrier.com/blog/archives/180.html#comment-590</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.jacobgrier.com/blog/archives/180.html#comment-590</guid>
		<description>Fucking conservatives.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fucking conservatives.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.jacobgrier.com/blog/archives/180.html#comment-591</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.jacobgrier.com/blog/archives/180.html#comment-591</guid>
		<description>If this ever passed (which it won't), I think someone should start a company that manufactures American flags with only 49 stars. That way, if people wanted to burn the flag, they could more or less do so without violating the law.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If this ever passed (which it won&#8217;t), I think someone should start a company that manufactures American flags with only 49 stars. That way, if people wanted to burn the flag, they could more or less do so without violating the law.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.jacobgrier.com/blog/archives/180.html#comment-592</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.jacobgrier.com/blog/archives/180.html#comment-592</guid>
		<description>I love this post's title!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love this post&#8217;s title!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.jacobgrier.com/blog/archives/180.html#comment-593</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.jacobgrier.com/blog/archives/180.html#comment-593</guid>
		<description>I have to agree, the post title is the best part. 

Interesting thing, this flag burning amendment. I think burning the flag is stupid and dispicable; I always have. However, one of my first encounters with the First Amendment was when the president of the ACLU gave a speech on flag burning at the NYLF on Law in Washington. Prior to her speech I was a big supporter of the amendment: after all, it si common sense that the symbol of a nation that has stood so steadfastly for freedom should not have it's most sacred national symbol defiled. 

Nadine, however, proved to me that the reason the flag held such meaning was precisely the freedom (even to burn it) for which it stood. That was a n earth-shattering realization for me. GReat post. I hope this thing dies quickly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to agree, the post title is the best part. </p>
<p>Interesting thing, this flag burning amendment. I think burning the flag is stupid and dispicable; I always have. However, one of my first encounters with the First Amendment was when the president of the ACLU gave a speech on flag burning at the NYLF on Law in Washington. Prior to her speech I was a big supporter of the amendment: after all, it si common sense that the symbol of a nation that has stood so steadfastly for freedom should not have it&#8217;s most sacred national symbol defiled. </p>
<p>Nadine, however, proved to me that the reason the flag held such meaning was precisely the freedom (even to burn it) for which it stood. That was a n earth-shattering realization for me. GReat post. I hope this thing dies quickly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Gintis</title>
		<link>http://www.jacobgrier.com/blog/archives/180.html#comment-594</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Gintis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.jacobgrier.com/blog/archives/180.html#comment-594</guid>
		<description>Good lord, a week and a day and no new posts! You'd think you were dead, not just traveling and working...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good lord, a week and a day and no new posts! You&#8217;d think you were dead, not just traveling and working&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.jacobgrier.com/blog/archives/180.html#comment-595</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.jacobgrier.com/blog/archives/180.html#comment-595</guid>
		<description>Yeah, ditto to what Adam said. I hope my bad blogging habits didn't rub off somehow.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, ditto to what Adam said. I hope my bad blogging habits didn&#8217;t rub off somehow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
