Those of you who’ve been wanting more of a smackdown between Paul Roberts and I won’t find it in today’s exchange, where we agree that there are plenty of reasons to enjoy eating natural, locally grown food — as long as you’re not kidding yourself about the health and environmental benefits. Read it here.
Tomorrow’s topic is foods that need to be banned, so things could get a little more heated then.
Goolsbee out? The disappointment continues
Ron Paul Q&A with Freakonomics; Part two
"Lizard People" for MN Senate seat
Eric Holder, another troubling Obama nomination
eHarmony, under duress, allows same-sex searches
Why Drudge Report's basic design rocks
MN recount: Let the controversy begin
Schmuck Alert: Documenting reporter harrassment
FP's physics lessons for the new administration
Cowgirl Creamery meets Counter Culture
Dubious financial gains from culinary school
Interview with cocktail historian David Wondrich
Obama renews pledge to use climate change as cover for handing out wasteful subsidies
Just what we need: A coffee shop glorifying Lenin and Guevara
The New Yorker(!) samples acclaimed TX barbecue
Jason Wilson compares orange liqueurs
The Libertarian Party's disappointing '08
The difficulty of predicting financial crises
Why the Mars rovers don't have dust wipers
Won't anyone think of the Starbucks?
What Starbucks employees regret saying
No comments yet.
RSS feed for comments on this post.
TrackBack URI
Leave a comment
Line and paragraph breaks automatic, e-mail address never displayed